Starlings have strong feet, their flight is strong and direct, and they are very gregarious. Their preferred habitat is fairly open country, and they eat insects and fruit. Several species live around human habitation, and are effectively omnivores. Many species search for prey such as grubs by "open-bill probing", that is, forcefully opening the bill after inserting it into a crevice, thus expanding the hole and exposing the prey; this behaviour is referred to by the German verb zirkeln (pronounced [ˈtsɪʁkəln]).[1]
Plumage of many species is typically dark with a metallic sheen. Most species nest in holes, laying blue or white eggs.
Starlings have diverse and complex vocalizations, and have been known to embed sounds from their surroundings into their own calls, including car alarms and human speech patterns. The birds can recognize particular individuals by their calls, and are currently the subject of research into the evolution of human language.[2]
Description
There is less sexual dimorphism in plumage however, with only 25 species showing such differences between the sexes. The plumage of the starling is often brightly coloured due to iridescence; this colour is derived from the structure of the feathers, not from any pigment. Some species of Asian starling have crests or erectile feathers on the crest. Other ornamentation includes elongated tail feathers and brightly coloured bare areas on the face. These colours can be derived from pigments, or, as in the Bali starling, structural colour, caused by light scattering off parallel collagen fibres. The irises of many species are red and yellow, although those of younger birds are much darker.[3]
Distribution, habitat and movements
Asian species are most common in evergreen forests; 39 species found in Asia are predominately forest birds as opposed to 24 found in more open or human modified environments. In contrast to this African species are more likely to be found in open woodlands and savannah; 33 species are open area specialists compared to 13 true forest species. The high diversity of species found in Asia and Africa is not matched by Europe, which has one widespread (and very common) species and two more restricted species. The European starling is both highly widespread and extremely catholic in its habitat, occupying most types of open habitat. Like many other starling species it has also adapted readily to human-modified habitat, including farmland, orchards, plantations and urban areas.[3]
Some species of starling are migratory, either entirely, like the Shelley's starling, which breeds in Ethiopia and northern Somalia and migrates to Kenya and southern Somalia, or the white-shouldered starling, which is migratory in part of its range but is resident in others.[3]
The European starling was purposefully introduced to North America in 1890–1891 by the American Acclimatization Society, an organization dedicated to introducing European flora and fauna into North America for cultural and economic reasons. Eugene Schieffelin, chairman at the time, allegedly decided all birds mentioned by William Shakespeare should be in North America. The bird had been mentioned in Henry IV, Part 1, and a hundred of them were released from New York's Central Park.[6]
Behaviour
Mimic
Starlings imitate a variety of avian species and have a repertoire of about 15–20 distinct imitations. They also imitate a few sounds other than those of wild birds. The calls of abundant species, calls that are simple in frequency structure and calls that show little amplitude modulation are preferentially imitated. There are local dialects of mimicked sounds.[3] Starlings have also been known to imitate other, man-made environmental sounds, such as phone boxes and cars.Diet and feeding
Systematics
The starlings belong to the superfamily Muscicapoidea, together with thrushes, flycatchers and chats, as well as dippers which are quite distant and Mimidae (thrashers and mockingbirds). The latter are apparently the Sturnidae's closest living relatives, replace them in the Americas, and have a rather similar but more solitary lifestyle. They are morphologically quite similar too—a partly albinistic specimen of a mimid, mislabelled as to suggest an Old World origin, was for many decades believed to represent an extinct starling (see Rodrigues starling for details).Usually the starlings are considered a family, as is done here. Sibley & Monroe(1990) included the mimids in the family and demoted the starlings to tribe rank, as Sturnini. This treatment was used by Zuccon et al. (2006). However, the grouping of Sibley & Monroe (besides leaving the subfamily rank vacant[verification needed]) is overly coarse due to methodological drawbacks of their DNA-DNA hybridization technique and most of their proposed revisions of taxonomic rank have not been accepted (see for example Ciconiiformes). The all-inclusive Sturnidae grouping is all but noninformative as regards biogeography, and obscures the evolutionary distinctness of the three lineages. Establishing a valid name for the clade consisting of Sibley/Monroe's "pan-Sturnidae" would nonetheless be desirable to contrast them with the other major lineages of Muscicapoidea.
Starlings probably originated in the general area of the East Asia, perhaps towards the southwestern Pacific, as evidenced by the number of plesiomorphic lineages to occur there. Expansion into Africa appears to have occurred later, as most derived forms are found there. An alternative scenario would be African origin for the entire "sturnoid" (as per Zuccon et al. 2006) group, with the oxpeckers representing an ancient relict and the mimids arriving in South America. This is contradicted by the North American distribution of the most basal Mimidae.(Cibois & Cracraft 2004, Zuccon et al. 2006)
As the fossil record is limited to quite Recent forms, the proposed Early Miocene (about 25–20 mya) divergence dates for the "sturnoids" lineages must be considered extremely tentative. Given the overall evidence for origin of most Passeri families in the first half of the Miocene, it appears to be not too far off the mark however.(Zuccon et al. 2006)
Recent studies (Cibois & Cracraft 2004, Zuccon et al. 2006) identified two major clades of this family, corresponding to the generally drab, often striped, largish "atypical mynas" and other mainly Asian-Pacific lineages, and the often smaller, sometimes highly apomorphic taxa which are most common in Africa and the Palearctic, usually have metallic coloration, and in a number of species also bright carotinoid plumage colors on the underside. Inside this latter group, there is a clade consisting of species which, again, are usually not too brightly colored, and which consists of the "typical" myna-Sturnus assemblage.
Interestingly, the Philippine creepers, a single genus of three species of treecreeper-like birds appear to be highly apomorphic members of the more initial radiation of the Sturnidae (Zuccon et al. 2006). While this may seem odd at first glance, their placement has always been contentious. In addition, biogeography virtually rules out a close relationship of Philippine creepers and treecreepers, as neither the latter nor their close relatives seem have ever reached the Wallacea, let alone the Philippines. Nonetheless, their inclusion in the Sturnidae is not entirely final and eventually they may remain a separate family.
Genus sequence follows traditional treatments. This is apparently not entirely correct, with Scissirostrum closer to Aplonis than to Gracula for example, and Acridotheres among the most advanced genera. Too few taxa have already been studied as regards their relationships however, and thus a change in sequence has to wait.
The review by Lovette & Rubenstein (2008) is the most recent work on the phylogeny of the group.[8]
Oriental-Australasian clade
- Genus Rhabdornis—Philippine creepers (three species; placement here requires confirmation)
- Genus Aplonis—Pacific starlings (c. 20 living species, 4–5 recently extinct)
- Genus Mino
- Yellow-faced myna, Mino dumontii
- Golden myna, Mino anais
- Long-tailed myna, Mino kreffti
- Genus Basilornis
- Sulawesi myna, Basilornis celebensis
- Helmeted myna, Basilornis galeatus
- Long-crested myna, Basilornis corythaix
- Apo myna, Basilornis mirandus
- Genus Sarcops—Coleto
- Genus Streptocitta
- White-necked myna, Streptocitta albicollis
- Bare-eyed myna, Streptocitta albertinae
- Genus Enodes—fiery-browed myna
- Genus Scissirostrum—finch-billed myna
- Genus Ampeliceps—golden-crested myna
- Genus Gracula—hill mynas (five species)
- Genus Leucopsar—Bali myna
Afrotropical-Palearctic clade
- Genus Acridotheres—typical mynas (eight species)
- Genus Agropsar (sometimes included in Sturnus or Sturnia) (2 species)
- Genus Sturnia (sometimes included in Sturnus)
- White-shouldered starling, Sturnia sinensis
- Chestnut-tailed starling, Sturnia malabarica
- White-headed starling, Sturnia erythropygia
- Malabar starling, Sturnia blythii
- Brahminy starling, Sturnia pagodarum
- Genus Sturnus—typical starlings (about 4 species; includes probably valid genera Spodiopsar and Temenuchus; but highly paraphyletic)
- Genus Pastor— rosy starling
- Genus Gracupica— 2 species
- Genus Sturnornis—white-faced starling
- Genus Creatophora—wattled starling
- Genus Notopholia (sometimes placed in Lamprotornis)
- Black-bellied starling, Notopholia corrusca[verification needed]
- Genus Lamprotornis—typical glossy-starlings (20 species; monophyly requires confirmation)
- Genus Cinnyricinclus—violet-backed starling
- Genus Poeoptera (formerly Pholia, sometimes included in Cinnyricinclus)
- Sharpe's starling, Poeoptera sharpii
- Abbott's starling, Poeoptera femoralis
- Genus Saroglossa (possibly paraphyletic)
- Spot-winged starling, Saroglossa spiloptera
- Madagascan starling, Saroglossa aurata
- Genus Spreo (paraphyletic with Lamprotornis and might be included there)
- Pied starling, Spreo bicolor
- Fischer's starling, Spreo fischeri
- White-crowned starling, Spreo albicapillus
- Genus Onychognathus
- Red-winged starling, Onychognathus morio
- Slender-billed starling, Onychognathus tenuirostris
- Chestnut-winged starling, Onychognathus fulgidus
- Waller's starling, Onychognathus walleri
- Somali starling, Onychognathus blythii
- Socotra starling, Onychognathus frater
- Tristram's starling, Onychognathus tristramii
- Pale-winged starling, Onychognathus nabouroup
- Bristle-crowned starling, Onychognathus salvadorii
- White-billed starling, Onychognathus albirostris
- Neumann's starling, Onychognathus neumanni
- Genus Poeoptera
- Narrow-tailed starling, Poeoptera lugubris
- Stuhlmann's starling, Poeoptera stuhlmanni
- Kenrick's starling, Poeoptera kenricki
- Genus Grafisia—white-collared starling
- Genus Speculipastor—magpie starling
- Genus Neocichla—babbling starling
Unresolved
The extinct Mascarene starlings are of uncertain relationships. Only one species is known from specimens taken while the bird was still extant; the other remains only known from subfossil bones and apparently one early traveller's description. The supposed "Leguat's starling" ("Necropsar leguati") was eventually determined to be a mislabeled albino specimen of the Martinique trembler (Cinclocerthia gutturalis), a mimid.As the avifauna of the Mascarenes is predominantly of Indian origin though as old as to be highly distinct, it is not clear to which clade these starlings belong—or even if they are indeed starlings, as the Réunion starling at least was highly aberrant and there have always been lingering doubts about whether they are correctly placed here.
- Genus Fregilupus—Réunion starling (extinct, 1850s)
- Genus Necropsar—Rodrigues starling (extinct, late 18th century?)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.